【商丘seo整站优化排名报价】

I concede that the peaker i on 开启the correct philoophical ide of thi iue. After all, reearch i the exploration of the unknown for true anwer to our quetion, and for lating olution to our enduring problem. Reearch i alo the chief mean by which we human attempt to atify our inatiable appetite for knowledge, and our craving to undertand ourelve and the world around u. Yet, in the very notion of reearch alo lie my firt point of contention with the peaker, who illogically preume that we can know the reult of reearch before we invet in it. To the contrary, if reearch i to be of any value it mut explore uncharted and unpredictable territory. In fact, query（=doubt）whether reearch whoe benefit are immediate and predictable can break any new ground, or whether it can be conidered reearch at all.

Iue 18

Money pent on 点评商丘seo整站优化排名报价reearch i almot alway a good invetment, even when the reult of that reearch are controverial.

I agree with the peaker broad aertion that money pent on reearch i generally money well inveted. However, the peaker unnecearily extend thi broad aertion to embrace reearch whoe reult are controverial, while ignoring certain compelling reaon why ome type of reearch might be unjutifiable. My point of contention with the peaker involve the fundamental objective and nature of reearch, a dicued below.

精华：However, the peaker unnecearily extend thi broad aertion to embrace reearch whoe reult are controverial, while ignoring certain compelling reaon why这种说法可以用来抨击原题观点的绝对化，

My point of contention with the peaker involve the fundamental objective and 开启nature of reearch, a dicued below.

带出自己观点的新句型。

最新评论